This document explains how Perl development works.  It includes details
       about the Perl 5 Porters email list, the Perl repository, the Perlbug
       bug tracker, patch guidelines, and commentary on Perl development

       If you just want to submit a single small patch like a pod fix, a test
       for a bug, comment fixes, etc., it's easy! Here's how:

       o   Check out the source repository

           The perl source is in a git repository.  You can clone the
           repository with the following command:

             % git clone git:// perl

       o   Ensure you're following the latest advice

           In case the advice in this guide has been updated recently, read
           the latest version directly from the perl source:

             % perldoc pod/perlhack.pod

       o   Make your change

           Hack, hack, hack.  Keep in mind that Perl runs on many different
           platforms, with different operating systems that have different
           capabilities, different filesystem organizations, and even
           different character sets.  perlhacktips gives advice on this.

       o   Test your change

           You can run all the tests with the following commands:

             % ./Configure -des -Dusedevel
             % make test

           Keep hacking until the tests pass.

       o   Commit your change

           Committing your work will save the change on your local system:

             % git commit -a -m 'Commit message goes here'

           Make sure the commit message describes your change in a single
           sentence.  For example, "Fixed spelling errors in perlhack.pod".

       o   Send your change to perlbug

           The next step is to submit your patch to the Perl core ticket
           system via email.

           If your changes are in a single git commit, run the following

             % git format-patch -3
             % ./perl -Ilib utils/perlbug -p 0001-fix1.patch,0002-fix2.patch,\
             > 0003-fix3.patch

           When prompted, pick a subject that summarizes your changes.

       o   Thank you

           The porters appreciate the time you spent helping to make Perl
           better.  Thank you!

       o   Next time

           The next time you wish to make a patch, you need to start from the
           latest perl in a pristine state.  Check you don't have any local
           changes or added files in your perl check-out which you wish to
           keep, then run these commands:

             % git pull
             % git reset --hard origin/blead
             % git clean -dxf

       If you want to report a bug in Perl, you must use the perlbug command
       line tool.  This tool will ensure that your bug report includes all the
       relevant system and configuration information.

       To browse existing Perl bugs and patches, you can use the web interface
       at <>.

       Please check the archive of the perl5-porters list (see below) and/or
       the bug tracking system before submitting a bug report.  Often, you'll
       find that the bug has been reported already.

       You can log in to the bug tracking system and comment on existing bug
       reports.  If you have additional information regarding an existing bug,
       please add it.  This will help the porters fix the bug.

       The perl5-porters (p5p) mailing list is where the Perl standard
       distribution is maintained and developed.  The people who maintain Perl
       are also referred to as the "Perl 5 Porters", "p5p" or just the

       A searchable archive of the list is available at
       <>.  There is also an
       archive at <>.

   perl-changes mailing list
       The perl5-changes mailing list receives a copy of each patch that gets
       submitted to the maintenance and development branches of the perl
       repository.  See <> for

       For much more detail on using git with the Perl repository, please see

   Read access via Git
       You will need a copy of Git for your computer.  You can fetch a copy of
       the repository using the git protocol:

         % git clone git:// perl

       This clones the repository and makes a local copy in the perl

       If you cannot use the git protocol for firewall reasons, you can also
       clone via http, though this is much slower:

         % git clone perl

   Read access via the web
       You may access the repository over the web.  This allows you to browse
       the tree, see recent commits, subscribe to RSS feeds for the changes,
       search for particular commits and more.  You may access it at
       <>.  A mirror of the repository is
       found at <>.

   Read access via rsync
       You can also choose to use rsync to get a copy of the current source
       tree for the bleadperl branch and all maintenance branches:

         % rsync -avz rsync:// .
         % rsync -avz rsync:// .
         % rsync -avz rsync:// .
         % rsync -avz rsync:// .
         % rsync -avz rsync:// .
         % rsync -avz rsync:// .

       (Add the "--delete" option to remove leftover files.)

       To get a full list of the available sync points:

         % rsync

   Write access via git
       If you have a commit bit, please see perlgit for more details on using

       If you're planning to do more extensive work than a single small fix,
       we encourage you to read the documentation below.  This will help you
       focus your work and make your patches easier to incorporate into the
       Perl source.

   Submitting patches
       If you have a small patch to submit, please submit it via perlbug.  You
       receive email.  In addition, an email will be sent to the p5p list.

       In other cases, the patch will need more work or discussion.  That will
       happen on the p5p list.

       You are encouraged to participate in the discussion and advocate for
       your patch.  Sometimes your patch may get lost in the shuffle.  It's
       appropriate to send a reminder email to p5p if no action has been taken
       in a month.  Please remember that the Perl 5 developers are all
       volunteers, and be polite.

       Changes are always applied directly to the main development branch,
       called "blead".  Some patches may be backported to a maintenance
       branch.  If you think your patch is appropriate for the maintenance
       branch (see "MAINTENANCE BRANCHES" in perlpolicy), please explain why
       when you submit it.

   Getting your patch accepted
       If you are submitting a code patch there are several things that you
       can do to help the Perl 5 Porters accept your patch.

       Patch style

       If you used git to check out the Perl source, then using "git
       format-patch" will produce a patch in a style suitable for Perl.  The
       "format-patch" command produces one patch file for each commit you
       made.  If you prefer to send a single patch for all commits, you can
       use "git diff".

         % git checkout blead
         % git pull
         % git diff blead my-branch-name

       This produces a patch based on the difference between blead and your
       current branch.  It's important to make sure that blead is up to date
       before producing the diff, that's why we call "git pull" first.

       We strongly recommend that you use git if possible.  It will make your
       life easier, and ours as well.

       However, if you're not using git, you can still produce a suitable
       patch.  You'll need a pristine copy of the Perl source to diff against.
       The porters prefer unified diffs.  Using GNU "diff", you can produce a
       diff like this:

         % diff -Npurd perl.pristine perl.mine

       Make sure that you "make realclean" in your copy of Perl to remove any
       build artifacts, or you may get a confusing result.

       Commit message

       As you craft each patch you intend to submit to the Perl core, it's
       important to write a good commit message.  This is especially important

       As a general rule of thumb, your commit message should help a
       programmer who knows the Perl core quickly understand what you were
       trying to do, how you were trying to do it, and why the change matters
       to Perl.

       o   Why

           Your commit message should describe why the change you are making
           is important.  When someone looks at your change in six months or
           six years, your intent should be clear.

           If you're deprecating a feature with the intent of later
           simplifying another bit of code, say so.  If you're fixing a
           performance problem or adding a new feature to support some other
           bit of the core, mention that.

       o   What

           Your commit message should describe what part of the Perl core
           you're changing and what you expect your patch to do.

       o   How

           While it's not necessary for documentation changes, new tests or
           trivial patches, it's often worth explaining how your change works.
           Even if it's clear to you today, it may not be clear to a porter
           next month or next year.

       A commit message isn't intended to take the place of comments in your
       code.  Commit messages should describe the change you made, while code
       comments should describe the current state of the code.

       If you've just implemented a new feature, complete with doc, tests and
       well-commented code, a brief commit message will often suffice.  If,
       however, you've just changed a single character deep in the parser or
       lexer, you might need to write a small novel to ensure that future
       readers understand what you did and why you did it.

       Comments, Comments, Comments

       Be sure to adequately comment your code.  While commenting every line
       is unnecessary, anything that takes advantage of side effects of
       operators, that creates changes that will be felt outside of the
       function being patched, or that others may find confusing should be
       documented.  If you are going to err, it is better to err on the side
       of adding too many comments than too few.

       The best comments explain why the code does what it does, not what it


       In general, please follow the particular style of the code you are

       o   Uncuddled elses and "K&R" style for indenting control constructs

       o   No C++ style (//) comments

       o   Mark places that need to be revisited with XXX (and revisit often!)

       o   Opening brace lines up with "if" when conditional spans multiple
           lines; should be at end-of-line otherwise

       o   In function definitions, name starts in column 0 (return value-type
           is on previous line)

       o   Single space after keywords that are followed by parens, no space
           between function name and following paren

       o   Avoid assignments in conditionals, but if they're unavoidable, use
           extra paren, e.g. "if (a && (b = c)) ..."

       o   "return foo;" rather than "return(foo);"

       o   "if (!foo) ..." rather than "if (foo == FALSE) ..." etc.

       o   Do not declare variables using "register".  It may be
           counterproductive with modern compilers, and is deprecated in C++,
           under which the Perl source is regularly compiled.

       o   In-line functions that are in headers that are accessible to XS
           code need to be able to compile without warnings with commonly used
           extra compilation flags, such as gcc's "-Wswitch-default" which
           warns whenever a switch statement does not have a "default" case.
           The use of these extra flags is to catch potential problems in
           legal C code, and is often used by Perl aggregators, such as Linux

       Test suite

       If your patch changes code (rather than just changing documentation),
       you should also include one or more test cases which illustrate the bug
       you're fixing or validate the new functionality you're adding.  In
       general, you should update an existing test file rather than create a
       new one.

       Your test suite additions should generally follow these guidelines
       (courtesy of Gurusamy Sarathy <>):

       o   Know what you're testing.  Read the docs, and the source.

       o   Tend to fail, not succeed.

       o   Interpret results strictly.

       o   Use unrelated features (this will flush out bizarre interactions).

       o   Promote unforeseen warnings to errors with $SIG{__WARN__}.

       o   Be sure to use the libraries and modules shipped with the version
           being tested, not those that were already installed.

       o   Add comments to the code explaining what you are testing for.

       o   Make updating the '1..42' string unnecessary.  Or make sure that
           you update it.

       o   Test _all_ behaviors of a given operator, library, or function.

           Test all optional arguments.

           Test return values in various contexts (boolean, scalar, list,

           Use both global and lexical variables.

           Don't forget the exceptional, pathological cases.

   Patching a core module
       This works just like patching anything else, with one extra

       Modules in the cpan/ directory of the source tree are maintained
       outside of the Perl core.  When the author updates the module, the
       updates are simply copied into the core.  See that module's
       documentation or its listing on <> for more
       information on reporting bugs and submitting patches.

       In most cases, patches to modules in cpan/ should be sent upstream and
       should not be applied to the Perl core individually.  If a patch to a
       file in cpan/ absolutely cannot wait for the fix to be made upstream,
       released to CPAN and copied to blead, you must add (or update) a
       "CUSTOMIZED" entry in the "Porting/" file to flag that a
       local modification has been made.  See "Porting/" for
       more details.

       In contrast, modules in the dist/ directory are maintained in the core.

   Updating perldelta
       For changes significant enough to warrant a pod/perldelta.pod entry,
       the porters will greatly appreciate it if you submit a delta entry
       along with your actual change.  Significant changes include, but are
       not limited to:

       o   Adding, deprecating, or removing core features

       o   Adding, deprecating, removing, or upgrading core or dual-life

       o   Adding new core tests

       Please make sure you add the perldelta entry to the right section
       within pod/perldelta.pod.  More information on how to write good
       perldelta entries is available in the "Style" section of

   What makes for a good patch?
       New features and extensions to the language can be contentious.  There
       is no specific set of criteria which determine what features get added,
       but here are some questions to consider when developing a patch:

       Does the concept match the general goals of Perl?

       Our goals include, but are not limited to:

       1.  Keep it fast, simple, and useful.

       2.  Keep features/concepts as orthogonal as possible.

       3.  No arbitrary limits (platforms, data sizes, cultures).

       4.  Keep it open and exciting to use/patch/advocate Perl everywhere.

       5.  Either assimilate new technologies, or build bridges to them.

       Where is the implementation?

       All the talk in the world is useless without an implementation.  In
       almost every case, the person or people who argue for a new feature
       will be expected to be the ones who implement it.  Porters capable of
       coding new features have their own agendas, and are not available to
       implement your (possibly good) idea.

       Backwards compatibility

       It's a cardinal sin to break existing Perl programs.  New warnings can
       be contentious--some say that a program that emits warnings is not
       broken, while others say it is.  Adding keywords has the potential to
       break programs, changing the meaning of existing token sequences or
       functions might break programs.

       The Perl 5 core includes mechanisms to help porters make backwards
       incompatible changes more compatible such as the feature and deprecate
       modules.  Please use them when appropriate.

       Could it be a module instead?

       Perl 5 has extension mechanisms, modules and XS, specifically to avoid
       the need to keep changing the Perl interpreter.  You can write modules
       that export functions, you can give those functions prototypes so they
       can be called like built-in functions, you can even write XS code to
       mess with the runtime data structures of the Perl interpreter if you
       want to implement really complicated things.

       Radical rewrites of large chunks of the Perl interpreter have the
       potential to introduce new bugs.

       How big is it?

       The smaller and more localized the change, the better.  Similarly, a
       series of small patches is greatly preferred over a single large patch.

       Does it preclude other desirable features?

       A patch is likely to be rejected if it closes off future avenues of
       development.  For instance, a patch that placed a true and final
       interpretation on prototypes is likely to be rejected because there are
       still options for the future of prototypes that haven't been addressed.

       Is the implementation robust?

       Good patches (tight code, complete, correct) stand more chance of going
       in.  Sloppy or incorrect patches might be placed on the back burner
       until the pumpking has time to fix, or might be discarded altogether
       without further notice.

       Is the implementation generic enough to be portable?

       The worst patches make use of system-specific features.  It's highly
       unlikely that non-portable additions to the Perl language will be

       Is the implementation tested?

       Patches which change behaviour (fixing bugs or introducing new
       features) must include regression tests to verify that everything works
       as expected.

       Without tests provided by the original author, how can anyone else
       changing perl in the future be sure that they haven't unwittingly
       broken the behaviour the patch implements? And without tests, how can
       the patch's author be confident that his/her hard work put into the
       patch won't be accidentally thrown away by someone in the future?

       Is there enough documentation?

       Patches without documentation are probably ill-thought out or
       incomplete.  No features can be added or changed without documentation,
       so submitting a patch for the appropriate pod docs as well as the
       source code is important.

       Is there another way to do it?

       Larry said "Although the Perl Slogan is There's More Than One Way to Do
       It, I hesitate to make 10 ways to do something".  This is a tricky
       heuristic to navigate, though--one man's essential addition is another
       man's pointless cruft.

       desire for the feature.

       The core uses the same testing style as the rest of Perl, a simple
       "ok/not ok" run through Test::Harness, but there are a few special

       There are three ways to write a test in the core: Test::More, t/
       and ad hoc "print $test ? "ok 42\n" : "not ok 42\n"".  The decision of
       which to use depends on what part of the test suite you're working on.
       This is a measure to prevent a high-level failure (such as
       breaking) from causing basic functionality tests to fail.

       The t/ library provides some of the features of Test::More, but
       avoids loading most modules and uses as few core features as possible.

       If you write your own test, use the Test Anything Protocol

       o   t/base, t/comp and t/opbasic

           Since we don't know if "require" works, or even subroutines, use ad
           hoc tests for these three.  Step carefully to avoid using the
           feature being tested.  Tests in t/opbasic, for instance, have been
           placed there rather than in t/op because they test functionality
           which t/ presumes has already been demonstrated to work.

       o   t/cmd, t/run, t/io and t/op

           Now that basic require() and subroutines are tested, you can use
           the t/ library.

           You can also use certain libraries like Config conditionally, but
           be sure to skip the test gracefully if it's not there.

       o   Everything else

           Now that the core of Perl is tested, Test::More can and should be
           used.  You can also use the full suite of core modules in the

       When you say "make test", Perl uses the t/TEST program to run the test
       suite (except under Win32 where it uses t/harness instead).  All tests
       are run from the t/ directory, not the directory which contains the
       test.  This causes some problems with the tests in lib/, so here's some
       opportunity for some patching.

       You must be triply conscious of cross-platform concerns.  This usually
       boils down to using File::Spec, avoiding things like "fork()" and
       "system()" unless absolutely necessary, and not assuming that a given
       character has a particular ordinal value (code point) or that its UTF-8
       representation is composed of particular bytes.

       There are several functions available to specify characters and code
       the UTF-8 bytes on an ASCII platform for that code point.  This
       function returns "\xC2\xA0" on an ASCII platform, and "\x80\x41" on an
       EBCDIC 1047 one.

       But easiest is, if the character is specifiable as a literal, like "A"
       or "%", to use that; if not so specificable, you can use use "\N{}" ,
       if the side effects aren't troublesome.  Simply specify all your
       characters in hex, using "\N{U+ZZ}" instead of "\xZZ".  "\N{}" is the
       Unicode name, and so it always gives you the Unicode character.
       "\N{U+41}" is the character whose Unicode code point is 0x41, hence is
       'A' on all platforms.  The side effects are:

       1)  These select Unicode rules.  That means that in double-quotish
           strings, the string is always converted to UTF-8 to force a Unicode
           interpretation (you can "utf8::downgrade()" afterwards to convert
           back to non-UTF8, if possible).  In regular expression patterns,
           the conversion isn't done, but if the character set modifier would
           otherwise be "/d", it is changed to "/u".

       2)  If you use the form "\N{character name}", the charnames module gets
           automatically loaded.  This may not be suitable for the test level
           you are doing.

       If you are testing locales (see perllocale), there are helper functions
       in t/ to enable you to see what locales there are on the
       current platform.

   Special "make test" targets
       There are various special make targets that can be used to test Perl
       slightly differently than the standard "test" target.  Not all them are
       expected to give a 100% success rate.  Many of them have several
       aliases, and many of them are not available on certain operating

       o   test_porting

           This runs some basic sanity tests on the source tree and helps
           catch basic errors before you submit a patch.

       o   minitest

           Run miniperl on t/base, t/comp, t/cmd, t/run, t/io, t/op, t/uni and
           t/mro tests.

       o   test.valgrind check.valgrind

           (Only in Linux) Run all the tests using the memory leak + naughty
           memory access tool "valgrind".  The log files will be named

       o   test_harness

           Run the test suite with the t/harness controlling program, instead
           of t/TEST.  t/harness is more sophisticated, and uses the
               nmake test TEST_FILES="op/*.t"
               nmake test TEST_SWITCHES="-torture" TEST_FILES="op/*.t"

       o   test-notty test_notty

           Sets PERL_SKIP_TTY_TEST to true before running normal test.

   Parallel tests
       The core distribution can now run its regression tests in parallel on
       Unix-like platforms.  Instead of running "make test", set "TEST_JOBS"
       in your environment to the number of tests to run in parallel, and run
       "make test_harness".  On a Bourne-like shell, this can be done as

           TEST_JOBS=3 make test_harness  # Run 3 tests in parallel

       An environment variable is used, rather than parallel make itself,
       because TAP::Harness needs to be able to schedule individual non-
       conflicting test scripts itself, and there is no standard interface to
       "make" utilities to interact with their job schedulers.

       Note that currently some test scripts may fail when run in parallel
       (most notably ext/IO/t/io_dir.t).  If necessary, run just the failing
       scripts again sequentially and see if the failures go away.

   Running tests by hand
       You can run part of the test suite by hand by using one of the
       following commands from the t/ directory:

           ./perl -I../lib TEST list-of-.t-files


           ./perl -I../lib harness list-of-.t-files

       (If you don't specify test scripts, the whole test suite will be run.)

   Using t/harness for testing
       If you use "harness" for testing, you have several command line options
       available to you.  The arguments are as follows, and are in the order
       that they must appear if used together.

           harness -v -torture -re=pattern LIST OF FILES TO TEST
           harness -v -torture -re LIST OF PATTERNS TO MATCH

       If "LIST OF FILES TO TEST" is omitted, the file list is obtained from
       the manifest.  The file list may include shell wildcards which will be
       expanded out.

       o   -v

           Run the tests under verbose mode so you can see what tests were
           run, and debug output.

       o   -torture
           /(LIST|OF|PATTERNS)/.  Note that with this form the patterns are
           joined by '|' and you cannot supply a list of files, instead the
           test files are obtained from the MANIFEST.

       You can run an individual test by a command similar to

           ./perl -I../lib path/to/foo.t

       except that the harnesses set up some environment variables that may
       affect the execution of the test:

       o   PERL_CORE=1

           indicates that we're running this test as part of the perl core
           test suite.  This is useful for modules that have a dual life on


           is set to 2 if it isn't set already (see "PERL_DESTRUCT_LEVEL" in

       o   PERL

           (used only by t/TEST) if set, overrides the path to the perl
           executable that should be used to run the tests (the default being


           if set, tells to skip the tests that need a terminal.  It's
           actually set automatically by the Makefile, but can also be forced
           artificially by running 'make test_notty'.

       Other environment variables that may influence tests

       o   PERL_TEST_Net_Ping

           Setting this variable runs all the Net::Ping modules tests,
           otherwise some tests that interact with the outside world are
           skipped.  See perl58delta.


           Setting this variable skips the vrexx.t tests for OS2::REXX.


           This sets a variable in op/numconvert.t.


           Setting this variable includes the tests in t/bigmem/.  This should
           be set to the number of gigabytes of memory available for testing,

       it has made, and whether anything else has slowed down as a

       The file t/perf/opcount.t is designed to test whether a particular code
       snippet has been compiled into an optree containing specified numbers
       of particular op types. This is good for testing whether optimisations
       which alter ops, such as converting an "aelem" op into an "aelemfast"
       op, are really doing that.

       The files t/perf/speed.t and t/re/speed.t are designed to test things
       that run thousands of times slower if a particular optimisation is
       broken (for example, the utf8 length cache on long utf8 strings).  Add
       a test that will take a fraction of a second normally, and minutes
       otherwise, causing the test file to time out on failure.

       To hack on the Perl guts, you'll need to read the following things:

       o   perlsource

           An overview of the Perl source tree.  This will help you find the
           files you're looking for.

       o   perlinterp

           An overview of the Perl interpreter source code and some details on
           how Perl does what it does.

       o   perlhacktut

           This document walks through the creation of a small patch to Perl's
           C code.  If you're just getting started with Perl core hacking,
           this will help you understand how it works.

       o   perlhacktips

           More details on hacking the Perl core.  This document focuses on
           lower level details such as how to write tests, compilation issues,
           portability, debugging, etc.

           If you plan on doing serious C hacking, make sure to read this.

       o   perlguts

           This is of paramount importance, since it's the documentation of
           what goes where in the Perl source.  Read it over a couple of times
           and it might start to make sense - don't worry if it doesn't yet,
           because the best way to study it is to read it in conjunction with
           poking at Perl source, and we'll do that later on.

           Gisle Aas's "illustrated perlguts", also known as illguts, has very
           helpful pictures:

           internal functions do, as well as the many macros used in the

       o   Porting/pumpkin.pod

           This is a collection of words of wisdom for a Perl porter; some of
           it is only useful to the pumpkin holder, but most of it applies to
           anyone wanting to go about Perl development.

       The CPAN testers ( ) are a group of volunteers
       who test CPAN modules on a variety of platforms.

       Perl Smokers ( and )
       automatically test Perl source releases on platforms with various

       Both efforts welcome volunteers.  In order to get involved in smoke
       testing of the perl itself visit
       <>.  In order to start smoke
       testing CPAN modules visit
       <> or
       <> or

       If you've read all the documentation in the document and the ones
       listed above, you're more than ready to hack on Perl.

       Here's some more recommendations

       o   Subscribe to perl5-porters, follow the patches and try and
           understand them; don't be afraid to ask if there's a portion you're
           not clear on - who knows, you may unearth a bug in the patch...

       o   Do read the README associated with your operating system, e.g.
           README.aix on the IBM AIX OS.  Don't hesitate to supply patches to
           that README if you find anything missing or changed over a new OS

       o   Find an area of Perl that seems interesting to you, and see if you
           can work out how it works.  Scan through the source, and step over
           it in the debugger.  Play, poke, investigate, fiddle! You'll
           probably get to understand not just your chosen area but a much
           wider range of perl's activity as well, and probably sooner than
           you'd think.

   "The Road goes ever on and on, down from the door where it began."
       If you can do these things, you've started on the long road to Perl
       porting.  Thanks for wanting to help make Perl better - and happy

   Metaphoric Quotations
       Legendarium, almost always from The Lord of the Rings.  Chapters and
       page numbers are given using the following editions:

       o   The Hobbit, by J.R.R. Tolkien.  The hardcover, 70th-anniversary
           edition of 2007 was used, published in the UK by Harper Collins
           Publishers and in the US by the Houghton Mifflin Company.

       o   The Lord of the Rings, by J.R.R. Tolkien.  The hardcover,
           50th-anniversary edition of 2004 was used, published in the UK by
           Harper Collins Publishers and in the US by the Houghton Mifflin

       o   The Lays of Beleriand, by J.R.R. Tolkien and published posthumously
           by his son and literary executor, C.J.R. Tolkien, being the 3rd of
           the 12 volumes in Christopher's mammoth History of Middle Earth.
           Page numbers derive from the hardcover edition, first published in
           1983 by George Allen & Unwin; no page numbers changed for the
           special 3-volume omnibus edition of 2002 or the various trade-paper
           editions, all again now by Harper Collins or Houghton Mifflin.

       Other JRRT books fair game for quotes would thus include The Adventures
       of Tom Bombadil, The Silmarillion, Unfinished Tales, and The Tale of
       the Children of Hurin, all but the first posthumously assembled by
       CJRT.  But The Lord of the Rings itself is perfectly fine and probably
       best to quote from, provided you can find a suitable quote there.

       So if you were to supply a new, complete, top-level source file to add
       to Perl, you should conform to this peculiar practice by yourself
       selecting an appropriate quotation from Tolkien, retaining the original
       spelling and punctuation and using the same format the rest of the
       quotes are in.  Indirect and oblique is just fine; remember, it's a
       metaphor, so being meta is, after all, what it's for.

       This document was originally written by Nathan Torkington, and is
       maintained by the perl5-porters mailing list.

perl v5.22.1                      2018-11-19                       PERLHACK(1)
Man Pages Copyright Respective Owners. Site Copyright (C) 1994 - 2019 Hurricane Electric. All Rights Reserved.